Demystifying Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic complexity. Ever heard the term thrown around and wondered what it really meant? You‘re not alone. While a vital software metric, cyclomatic complexity remains shrouded in mystery for many developers and testers alike.

But understanding complexity provides invaluable insight into building better software faster. This comprehensive guide breaks down everything you need to know about cyclomatic complexity using plain language any member of your team can understand.

Back to Basics: What Is Cyclomatic Complexity?

Cyclomatic complexity simply counts the number of independent paths through a block of code. It quantifies code complexity by measuring the minimum number of test cases needed for full test coverage.

Developed by Thomas McCabe in 1976, it provides a software metric to determine code testability, understandability, and maintainability.

The more paths that code contains internally, with branches, loops, case statements, and nesting structures, the higher the complexity and generally the risk. Complex code tends to be more prone to defects and costly to modify safely.

Keeping complexity low is key for managing change and building reliable software at scale.

Calculating Complexity Step-By-Step

New to cyclomatic complexity or need a refresher on the formula? Let‘s walk through an example calculating complexity for the code below:

function processOrder(order) {

  let shippingPriority;

  if (order.isPriority) {
    shippingPriority = "high";
  } else { 
    shippingPriority = "normal";
  }

  logOrder(order);

  switch (order.status) {
    case "paid": 
      shipOrder(order);
      break;

    case "refunded":
      handleRefund(order);

    case "out of stock":
      backorder(order);  

    default:  
      replyToCustomer(order);
  }

}

This code snippet has:

  • 1 IF statement
  • 1 SWITCH/CASE with 4 code paths
  • For a total of 5 linear branches

So what‘s the complexity formula again?

Cyclomatic Complexity = E – N + 2P

Where:

  • E = Number of edges
  • N = Number of nodes
  • P = Number of disconnected parts of the graph

Here we have:

  • Edges E = 5 code branches
  • Nodes N = 12 statements
  • Parts P = 1 graph

Plugging it in:

*Complexity = 5 – 12 + (2 1) = 5**

Easy right? Each control branch adds 1.

Why Does Code Complexity Matter?

High complexity code has exponentially higher risk of defects based on industry research.

One study by NIST found that each unit of complexity increased defect potential at an average rate of 5 – 15%. So complexity 5 code versus complexity 10 code could contain 50 – 150% more bugs!

Complex code also suffers degraded readability, making modification more likely to inject new defects. This leads to frustrating, hard to diagnose defects impacting customers.

Setting Code Quality Limits

To reap maintainability and testing benefits, set organization-wide cyclomatic complexity limits:

Metric Limit
Per-method complexity <= 10
Per-class complexity <= 50
Per-application <= 500

Of course guidelines should be adjusted for your technology stack and capabilities. But start strict for maximum improvement!

Reviewing and Refactoring Complex Code

Static analysis tools like SonarQube can calculate complexity on every commit. Flag code exceeding set limits for refactoring before release.

Reviewing complex sections of code often reveals:

  • Nested conditionals driving complexity – ideal to decompose
  • Switch/case statements with high complexity – break into polymorphic classes
  • Long parameter lists indicating violated single responsibility principle

Refactoring opportunities abound! Start simplifying flagged hotspots and retest to validate maintained behavior. Rinse and repeat approach for the most improvement over time.

Combining Code Quality Metrics

While invaluable, cyclomatic complexity doesn‘t catch everything. Combine it with other code quality metrics for the clearest picture like:

  • LOC metrics – Lines of code per method/class
  • Coupling – Interconnectivity between modules
  • Cohesion – Intra-relatedness within modules

Set limits for each metric and fail builds when numbers trend dangerously high. Let the numbers guide systematically writing better code every commit!

The Cost of Complexity

Still not sold your team should invest time focusing on complexity? Here is sobering data on the real-world cost of unchecked complexity growth:

  • Legacy systems with complexity over 100 have shown defect rates 8 times higher than lower complexity code (NIST)
  • Fixing defects in production has shown to cost upwards of $170 per defect on average (IBM)
  • 75% of development costs are spent purely on maintenance and defect fixes (Software Engineering Institute)

The economic argument for proactive complexity management through reviews, refactoring, and fail-safes speaks for itself.

Conquering Complexity as a Team

Cyclomatic complexity provides an invaluable window into code health and testability. But the metrics mean nothing if ignored.

Have your team take ownership of complexity as a key quality metric. Set limits, automate checks, refactor relentlessly, and test thoroughly based on hotspot indicators.

While no silver bullet, making cyclomatic complexity a cornerstone of your development practices can drive massive improvements in software reliability and cost over time.

So don‘t let complexity languish as a mysterious metric only discussed occasionally. Master complexity before it masters your team‘s productivity!

Read More Topics