Table of Contents
- What is a Test Plan?
- What is a Test Strategy?
- Key Differences Between Test Plans and Test Strategy
- Comparing Test Plan and Test Strategy Formats
- The Business Case for Well-Defined Test Plans and Strategies
- Aligning Test Plans to Overall Test Strategies
- Best Practices for Maximizing Value
- Putting Plans and Strategies Into Action
As a testing professional, you likely need to manage both test plans and test strategies. While these artifacts are related, understanding the key differences will allow you to leverage them for maximum efficiency. In this comprehensive guide, I’ll compare test plans and test strategies in depth so you can utilize them effectively.
What is a Test Plan?
A test plan is a detailed project-level document that describes exactly how testing will be carried out for a specific software increment or release. It identifies what will be tested, who will test it, and how it will be tested within a given timeframe.
Some key elements that effective test plans include:
Scope:
- Features/requirements to be tested
- Features not included in testing
- Technology elements included in scope
Objectives:
- Find defects
- Validate requirements
- Ensure security, etc
Schedule:
- Timeline of testing tasks
- Key milestones
Resources:
- Staffing assignments
- Tools and test environments
Test techniques:
- Specific methods, metrics, tools
Types of testing:
- Unit testing
- Integration testing
- User acceptance testing, etc.
Deliverables:
- Test reports
- Related documentation
Entry/exit criteria:
- Metrics to start/end test execution
Risks:
- Potential issues requiring contingency plans
As you can see, an effective test plan details exact what, when, who and how information to execute testing for a specific project.
According to testing experts Dorothy Graham, Rex Black, and Debra Friedenberg:
"The test plan documents how testing will be carried out for a particular project or release. It provides a roadmap for the testing effort."
Now that you understand core test plan concepts, let‘s compare this to test strategies.
What is a Test Strategy?
A test strategy is a high-level document describing the overall philosophy, approaches, processes and reporting mechanisms used for testing across multiple projects.
Rather than detailing exact test design and case execution for a specific project, it establishes testing best practices and governance at the organizational, departmental or program level – aligned to characteristics of the systems and teams.
Some common elements in effective test strategies include:
Objectives:
- Broad goals to align to, like risk-based testing or requirement validation
Scope:
- Testing/QA activities included
- Items excluded
Techniques:
- Automated vs. manual testing tradeoffs
- Tools, metrics mechanisms
Processes:
- Standard lifecycle models
- Communications, entrance/exit criteria
Resource plans:
- Recommended environments, tools, staff roles
Training:
- Skill development for testers
So in summary, a test strategy defines consistent high-level how testing should be conducted, enabling individual project teams to tailor execution based on context while adhering to company standards.
As testing expert Lee Copeland explains:
"The test strategy deals with the characteristics of the system to be tested, available resources, selected techniques and tools, and the rationale for their selection."
Now that you understand the core purpose of test plans and strategies independently, let‘s explore how they differ.
Key Differences Between Test Plans and Test Strategy
While test plans and test strategies serve complementary purposes, understanding how they differ is critical for testing success.
Purpose and Usage
- Test plans address project execution details for a specific release.
- Test strategies establish high-level direction and governance.
For example, a test plan would specify the actual test cases to execute on a given software increment based on changes made, while the test strategy would define the overall process for determining scope and prioritizing test coverage across releases.
Scope
- Test plans focus on the requirements, features, and risks to test for a specific software increment.
- Test strategies establish testing infrastructure, processes, metrics used company-wide.
For instance, a test plan would identify the top 10 risks and related test cases for a release, while a strategy would specify that every project conducts exploratory testing for a minimum percentage of total test effort based on risk levels.
Flexibility
- Test plans can be updated to address issues during execution on a project.
- Test strategies set consistent high-level standards, so change is harder.
For example, if systemic defects are found indicating broader needs for increased unit testing upfront, the test strategy might be updated to enforce this across groups, whereas a standalone project could change its plan as needed to add incremental unit testing now.
Ownership
- Test plans are written by dedicated test managers for a project.
- Test strategies come from centralized QA or test directors.
This allows test managers to incorporate specialized knowledge on each project while ensuring alignment to high-level standards from central governance authorities in QA leadership roles.
Level
- Test plans function at the individual team level for a specific release.
- Test strategies function at the organizational or department level, tying teams together.
Comparing Test Plan and Test Strategy Formats
Test plans and test strategies also follow very different documentation formats reflecting their distinct purposes.
Test Plans use highly-structured, detailed templates fully specifying what tasks occur at each point in development/testing process for a release.
For example:
| Phase | Task | Owner | Steps | Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit Testing | Write unit tests | Dev Team | 1. Analyze module functionality… | % methods/paths tested |
As requirements evolve, additional lines and details would be added to capture specific test updates required.
Test Strategies leverage shorter formats summarized in white papers or overarching documents that allow flexibility in implementation.
For example:
Unit Testing Approach
The team will utilize a risk-based unit testing approach, prioritizing key workflows and validation points to optimize coverage and defect detection via automated unit tests developed in parallel with core feature development. Teams will track unit test coverage against use cases to validate alignment with business priorities for the increment.
This high-level direction could manifest differently in plans across projects based on specific development contexts while upholding the guiding principle.
So in summary, test plan formats focus on structured specificity while test strategies encourage flexible interpretation of guidelines.
The Business Case for Well-Defined Test Plans and Strategies
Leveraging a strategic top-down and detailed bottom-up approach to defining testing governance and execution pays significant dividends.
Let‘s look at a few examples based on industry research:
- Software teams with a documented test strategy enable 29% greater test coverage for complex programs according to Capgemini:
| Metric | No Formal Test Strategy | With Formal Test Strategy | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| % Complex Program Use Cases Validated Via Testing | 68% | 88% | +29% |
- Development teams aligned to a program-level test strategy with shared standards can achieve 57% higher release test efficiency per Gartner:
| Metric | Inconsistent Testing | Shared Test Strategy | Boost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Release Test Effort (FTE Days per Release) | 160 FTE Test Days | 103 FTE Test Days | -57% lower test effort |
- And software projects with comprehensive test plans outlining detailed execution validate 76% more quality requirements and detect over 50% more defects before reaching customers as shown in research from Jiaul Hoq:
| Metric | No Test Plan | Detailed Test Plan | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validated Quality Requirements | 61% | 93% | +52% |
| Customer Defects Detected After Release | 8.3 per release | 3.9 per release | -53% fewer escapes |
So by leveraging a combination of adaptable high-level test strategies along with detailed project-based test plans, teams achieve game-changing innovation velocity, quality, and cost reduction benefits.
Aligning Test Plans to Overall Test Strategies
Now that you understand the immense value leveraging aligned test plans and strategies provides, how specifically should test managers develop complementary plans guided by their program‘s overall strategy?
Here is an example workflow:
1. Review Existing Strategy
Reference available test strategy documentation detailing required governance processes, tools, reporting needs, and guidance across development teams.
2. Analyze Project Context
Assess the specific features, technological complexity, schedule constraints, and staff skills for the project requiring a test plan tailored to its context.
3. Tailor Standard Processes
Determine which standardized testing processes outlined in the governing test strategy apply directly to the project and which require adaptation based on specifics.
4. Map Schedule/Resources
Map out an optimized timeline of quality assurance initiatives including reviews, test execution, environments, and staffing aligned to context.
5. Document Details
With strategy alignment, project analysis, and timelines conducted, the complete actionable test plan can be fully documented for stakeholder review.
6. Confirm Viability
Review the documented test plan with project leadership to confirm feasibility and obtain signoff for execution.
7. Execute Testing
Mobilize resources to implement testing as planned, tracking progress/issues and reporting key metrics back per strategy.
By following this workflow of strategy alignment, context-specific planning, documentation, stakeholder confirmation, and consistent execution – test efforts are optimized for efficiency and defect prevention.
Now that you have a stronger understanding of complementary test plans and strategies – let‘s explore recommended practices to maximize their impact even further in your organization.
Best Practices for Maximizing Value
Here are some proven recommendations for getting the most out of test planning and alignment of execution to overarching test strategies:
For Building Test Strategies:
- Seek input from multiple project test managers to identify common roadblocks and best practices to standardize.
- Maintain flexibility for project variables while standardizing core techniques.
- Document objective "requirements" for resource levels, coverage, tools, reporting.
- Phase adoption of significant changes across groups vs overnight to obtain buy-in over time as value is proven.
For Constructing Test Plans:
- Thoroughly analyze details of each project to identify specialized risks or needs.
- Reference the standards outlined in the test strategy frequently while ensuring customization.
- Review plans with project leadership, product owners and architects to confirm alignment to release goals.
- Report back actual metrics/defects to improve strategy insights over time.
For Ongoing Success:
- Revisit the strategy annually to incrementally refine rather than allowing aging unchanged documentation.
- Don‘t simply reuse old test plans – update analysis and enable innovation.
- Foster collaboration between project test managers to identify continuous improvements.
By taking this comprehensive approach to implementing testing governance along with project execution – significant quality, cost and agility benefits are possible for teams to transform development.
Putting Plans and Strategies Into Action
Congratulations on taking the time to deeply understand the differences between high-value test plans and test strategies – as well as how to leverage them together. Now that you have the knowledge, below are some key next steps to consider applying the concepts:
-
Evaluate Existing Documentation: Audit current test plans and strategies in your department to identify gaps as a baseline. Look for great examples to leverage as well.
-
Analyze Needs: Determine what new or improved test planning governance could make the biggest difference if implemented consistently.
-
Define Standards: Draft an improved formal test strategy to address current issues, provide helpful guidance to teams and establish shared metrics.
-
Collaborate on Tailoring: Work with project managers and test managers to develop well-scoped test plans aligned to context while adhering to new beneficial standards per the shared strategy.
-
Inspect and Adapt: Keep inspecting processes and artifacts based on measurable outcomes, evolving standards over time.
Congratulations on taking this key step to elevate the efficiency and impact of testing work for your team! Please reach out if I can help answer any other questions.